@article{Howard_2018, title={A Meta-Reanalysis of Dream-ESP Studies: Comment on Storm et al. (2017)}, volume={11}, url={https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/IJoDR/article/view/52040}, DOI={10.11588/ijodr.2018.2.52040}, abstractNote={Storm, Sherwood, Roe, Tressoldi, Rock and Risio (2017) performed a meta-analysis of laboratory studies of ESP in dreams, finding a moderate overall effect (r = .20).  Certain statistical decisions, such as primarily reporting unweighted effects, may have inflated these observations.  In the current article, I perform an inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis using the database provided by Storm et al., finding a much smaller overall effect (r = .07).  I also find evidence that a significant relationship exists between effect size and sample size, suggesting that the prior results may have been primarily driven by large effects found in small-n studies.  I suggest that future researchers of ESP in dreams should produce more large-n studies, which could alleviate many notable criticisms of the current psi literature.}, number={2}, journal={International Journal of Dream Research}, author={Howard, Matthew C.}, year={2018}, month={Nov.}, pages={224–229} }