Presenting Fragments as Quotations or Quotations as Fragments

  • Alexandra Trachsel (Autore)
    Universität Hamburg
    Privatdozentin am Institut für Griechische und Lateinische Philolgie

Identificativi (Articolo)

Identificativi (File)

Abstract

In this paper, we shall present some reflections on issues that arise when scholars prepare new editions of fragmentarily preserved works from antiquity. Our focus will be on those fragments that are transmitted as quotations in other extant texts from antiquity. In such cases, the textual sequences considered as fragments have to be dealt with in a particular way, as they are the results of several selection processes that have not been taken into account adequately previously. A digital approach provides better means to represent this special form of fragments, so that the complexity of the transmission of these pieces of evidence can be understood more accurately.

Statistiche

loading

Riferimenti bibliografici

Berti (2009): Berti, M., Romanello, M., Babeu, A. and Crane, G., „Collecting Fragmentary Authors in a Digital Library“, in: Proceedings of the 2009 Joint International Conference on Digital Libraries, Austin TX, New York, 259–262.

Berti (2012): Berti M., „Citazioni e dinamiche testuali. L’intertestualità e la storiografia greca frammentaria“, in: V. Costa (ed.), Tradizione e Trasmissione degli Storici Greci Frammentari II. Atti del Terzo Workshop Internazionale, Roma, 24–26 febbraio 2011, Tivoli (Roma), 439–458.

Berti (2013): Berti M., „Collecting Quotations by Topic: Degrees of Preservation and Transtextual Relations among Genres“, Ancient Society 43, 269–288.

Biraschi (2011): Biraschi A. M., „Demetrios von Skepsis (2013)“, in: H.-J. Gehrke (ed.), Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, Part V, Brill Online [first published online in 2011 at <http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/fragmente-der-griechischen-historiker-v/demetrios-von-skepsis-2013-a2013>].

Gehrke (2016): Gehrke H.-J., „About Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker continued Part V (about_v)“, in: H.-J. Gehrke (ed.), Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker Part V, Brill Online [Consulted online on 08 September 2016 at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_jcv_aabout_v>].

Gaede (1880): Gaede R., Demetrii Scepsii quae supersunt, Greifswald.

Lenfant (2013): Lenfant D., „The Study of Intermediate Authors and its Role in the Interpretation of Historical Fragments“, Ancient Society 43, 289–305.

Lenfant (2002): Lenfant D., „Les citations de Thucydide dans les scholies d’Aristophane: contribution à l’analyse de fragments d’historiens“, in: S. Pittia (ed.), Fragments d’historiens grecs. Autour de Denys d’Halicarnasse, Rome, 415–447.

Montana (2015): Montana F., „Hellenistic Scholarship“, in: F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, and A. Rengakos (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Leiden-Boston, 60–183.

Montanari (1993): Montanari F., „Pergamo“, in: G. Cambiano, L. Canfora, and D. Lanza (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, tom. 1,2: LʼEllenismo, Roma-Salerno, 639–655.

Montanari (2015): Montanari F., „Ekdosis. A Product of the Ancient Scholarship“, in: F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, and A. Rengakos (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Leiden-Boston, 641–672.

Müller (1851): Müller C., Fragmenta historicorum graecorum (vol. 4), Paris.

Pagani (2016): Pagani L., „Demetrius [2]“, in: F. Montanari, F. Montana, and L. Pagani (eds.), Lexicon of Greek Grammarians of Antiquity, BrillOnline [consulted online on 04 March 2017 at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2451-9278_lgga_urn:cite:cidocCRM.E21:lgga.Demetrius_2_it>].

Romanello (2009): Romanello M., Berti, M., Boschetti, F., Babeu, A. and Crane, G., „Rethinking Critical Editions of Fragmentary Texts by Ontologies“, in: S. Mornati (ed.), Rethinking Electronic Publishing: Innovation in Communication Paradigms and Technologies – Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Publishing held in Milano, Italy 10–12 June 2009, Milano, 155–174.

Romanello (2011): Romanello M., „The Digital Critical Edition of Fragments: Theoretical Problems and Technical Solution“, in: P. Cotticelli Kurras (ed.), Linguistica e Filologia Digitale: Aspetti e Progetti, Alessandria, 147–155.

Schepens (1997): Schepens G., „Jacobyʼs FGrHist: Problems, Methods, Prospects“, in: G.W. Most (ed.), Collecting Fragments – Fragmente sammeln, Göttingen, 144–172.

Schepens (2000): Schepens, G., „Probleme der Fragmentedition (Fragmente der griechischen Historiker)“, in: C. Reitz (ed.), Vom Text zum Buch, St. Katharinen, 1–29.

Stiehle (1850): Stiehle R., „Der Τρωϊκὸς διάκοσμος des Demetrios von Skepsis“, Philologus 5, 528–546.

Stiehle (1851): Stiehle R., „Nachtrag zu der Abhandlung „Der Τρωϊκὸς διάκοσμος des Demetrios von Skepsis“, Philologus 6, 344–347.

Trachsel (2012): Trachsel, A., „Collecting Fragments Today: What Status Will a Fragment Have in the Era of Digital Philology?“, in: C. Clivaz, J. Meizoz, F. Vallotton, and J. Verheyden (eds.), Lire demain – Reading tomorrow, Lausanne (e-book version), 415–429.

Contenuto supplementare

Pubblicato
2017-11-02
Lingua
en
Parole chiave
editorial work, fragments, quotations, Homeric scholarship