https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/issue/feedWorking Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papers2017-12-01T09:10:16+01:00Prof. Dr. Charlotte Schubertschubert@uni.leipzig.deOpen Journal Systems<p>Die eAQUA Working Papers sind aus der Reihe der Working Papers Contested Order des Profilbildenden Bereichs Contested Order der Universität Leipzig hervorgegangen. Ausgehend von den Forschungen zu dem Thema „Riskante Ordnungen – Contested Order“ sind in der Reihe Beiträge von Politikwissenschaftlern, Historikern und Altertumswissenschaftlern publiziert worden. Das Forschungsprogramm des Profilbildenden Bereichs thematisierte insbesondere lokale Verhältnisse, deren partikulare Gleichgewichtszustände nicht wohlbedachte Ergebnisse scharfsinniger Pläne sind, sondern von Mal zu Mal „strittig“ ausgehandelt werden müssen. Die diesem ursprünglichen Profil der Reihe entsprechenden Bände Nr. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 stehen hier weiterhin zum freien Download zur Verfügung.<br><br>In den Bänden Nr. 1, 3, 7, 9, 10 dieser Reihe sind Ergebnisse aus dem Forschungsfeld der Digital Humanities veröffentlicht worden, die in dem Projekt eAQUA entstanden sind. eAQUA ist als Projekt das Ergebnis einer langjährigen Zusammenarbeit zwischen Altertumswissenschaftlern und Informatikern an der Universität Leipzig gewesen und hat zum Aufbau des Portals eAQUA geführt (<a href="http://www.eaqua.net">www.eaqua.net</a>). Durch das Förderprogramm «Wechselwirkungen zwischen Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften» des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung wurde der Aufbau des Portals im Zusammenhang der Entwicklung fachspezifischer Anwendungen auf der Grundlage der Sprachen Latein und Griechisch von 2008 bis 2011 gefördert (Koordination: G. Heyer, Informatik, Universität Leipzig und Ch. Schubert, Alte Geschichte, Universität Leipzig).<br><br>Von 2011 bis 2013 hat das Projekt eine weitere Förderung durch das Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung erhalten (Leitung: Ch. Schubert, Alte Geschichte, Universität Leipzig), die die Verstetigung des eAQUA-Portals und die Weiternutzung der in eAQUA entwickelten Verfahren unterstützt.<br> <br>Im Rahmen dieser Forschungsprojekte sind zahlreiche Beiträge von Wissenschaftlern und Wissenschaftlerinnen aus Hamburg, Heidelberg und Leipzig entstanden, für die ein Publikationsort gefunden wurde.<br><br>Die eAQUA Working Papers haben im Rahmen der Reihe der Working Papers Contested Order des Profilbildenden Bereichs Contested Order der Universität Leipzig ein eigenes Profil entwickelt. <br><br>Diese Beiträge, die in Working Papers Contested Order publiziert wurden, sind nun hier versammelt und stehen ebenfalls als Einzelband oder Einzelbeitrag zum freien Download zur Verfügung.<br><br>Da die Publikationen aus dem Projekt eAQUA eine gute Resonanz und hohe Nachfrage erzeugt haben, soll dieser Publikationsort für wissenschaftliche Beiträge, die Methoden der Digital Humanities auf Fragestellungen aus der Alten Geschichte und der Klassischen Archäologie anwenden, für Nachwuchswissenschaftlern und Nachwuchswissenschaftlerinnen und insbesondere auch für hervorragende Ergebnisse aus studentischen Projekten weiterhin zur Verfügung stehen.<br><br></p>https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18452Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-10-20T10:15:27+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18451AutorInnen2016-10-20T10:15:25+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18450Literatur2016-10-20T10:15:24+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184496.3 Die Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektive2016-10-20T10:15:21+02:00Maria Hahnekampbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184486.2 Anders als in den Sozialwissenschaften. Ein naturwissenschaftlicher Ansatz zur Erklärung nomadischer Mobilität2016-10-20T10:15:20+02:00Romina Martinbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deKirill Istominbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184476.1 Überlegungen zur historischen Perspektive der Mobilitätsforschung2016-10-20T10:15:18+02:00Marco Stockhusenbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184466 Drei Perspektiven. Ausblick und disziplinäre Kommentare zur Interpretation der Ergebnisse2016-10-20T10:15:17+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThe final part offers disciplinary approaches towards the working group’s notion of ‘mobility’. Research outlook are presented from a historical (6.1), natural-science (6.2) and socialscience (6.3) perspective respectively. On the one hand, this reveals the terminological and <br />methodological differences that were perceived as obstacles during the interdisciplinary dialogue.<br />On the other hand, this discussion is elementary to the practical interdisciplinary work, documenting how individual and selective perceptions shaped the group work in a transparent way.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184455 Das Plenum 2010: Handel und Mobilität im Sudan zwischen nomothetischer und idiographischer Perspektive2016-10-20T10:15:15+02:00Enrico Illebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deBased on the previously developed scheme of mobility phenomena this chapter presents research results on trade and mobility in Sudan. The author continues with an epistemological discussion on the characteristics and value of the scheme in explaining mobility.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184444.2 Gegenwartsbezogenes Fallbeispiel: Marktintegration und Mobilität im Osten des tibetischen Hochplateaus2016-10-20T10:15:14+02:00Janka Linkebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184434.1 Historisches Fallbeispiel: Völkerwanderungen im römischen Reich2016-10-20T10:15:12+02:00Thomas Brüggemannbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184424 Mobilität erfassen: Auswertung der Umfrage 20112016-10-20T10:15:10+02:00Janka Linkebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.dePart 4 presents results of the 2011 survey conducted among the subprojects of the Collaborative Research Centre. The responses were originally supposed to deliver crucial input for the working group's further approach towards 'mobility'. However, admitting the limited significance of the survey results, the working group started to draw on the ultimate strength of the entire Research Centre: the great number of individual case studies on mobile (nomadic) communities. Hence, part 4.1 deals with a historical case study on the temporal migration of the actually sedentary Germanic tribes (375-568) during their encroachment into the Roman Empire. The author Thomas Brüggemann points to the multiple causes of Germanic mobility and describes how the Germanic peoples adapted to the mobile way of life by employing specific nomadic techniques and practices. In contrast, the empirical case study (4.2) on the caterpillar fungus economy in eastern Tibetan areas (Qinghai Province, China) by Janka Linke seeks to combine the concepts of 'social' and 'spatial' mobility by linking specific notions of markets and resources. The contrasting case studies allow insights into the different methodological and conceptual approaches of empirical and historical research respectively.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184411 Einleitung2016-10-20T10:15:09+02:00Maria Hahnekampbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThomas Brüggemannbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deJana Linkebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deRomina Martinbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThis report reflects on mobility as current and historical phenomenon in human societies. <br />The paper is based on four years of research in a working group on mobility within the Collaborative <br />Research Centre (Sonderforschungsbereich) which focused on interdependencies between nomadic and sedentary people. The authors provide various perspectives on the specification of mobility phenomena and the constitution of knowledge systems based on the diverse disciplines involved, such as archeology, ancient history, ethnography, social geography and ecological-system science. The challenge was to find a common ground discussing <br />mobility where social and natural scientists exchanged and built upon their empirical and theoretical knowledge. The rich data base of case studies provided a starting point for a constructive dialogue. The report allows insights into the recent state of the art and questions of mobility research. On a wider level it illustrates how interdisciplinary projects <br />can work effectively on such an intersecting topic. The report finalizes with disciplinary outlooks on synergies gained from this work.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184403 Die interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. Konsens und Kompromisse in der Entwicklung eines gemeinsamen Mobilitätsbegriffs2016-10-20T10:15:07+02:00Romina Martinbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deMaria Hahnekampbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deAfter four years of work, the results of the working group mobility are presented as ethnological case study for interdisciplinary cooperation. Important steps are described chronologically by referring to protocols, summaries of plenary sessions and discussions about literature. By doing so, one can follow how this group analysed notions of mobility and the current state of research on mobility. Using the concepts of social world, arenas, boundary objects, and conventions supported the critical review of this negotiation process. Conclusively, <br />characteristics of the interdisciplinary group such as personal background, expectations and goals shaped how mobility was commonly understood at the end.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/184392 Reflexion und Anpassung – Über die Forschungssituation in Deutschland und das wissenschaftliche Streben nach Innovation durch Interdisziplinarität2016-10-20T10:15:06+02:00Felix Paetzelbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThe starting point of this paper is the question how different scholars from different scientific cultures come together to work on a certain subject, in our case the broad term “mobility”. I argue that the postmodern perception of knowledge and technology, as uncertain paired with the permanent social need for innovation, created a scientific landscape where <br />interdisciplinarity is one of the most popular answers to our epistemic problems, especially in the growing area of external funding. In the following, I describe certain aspects of the landscape of research in Germany in particular the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as the largest institution of external funding and their implementation of innovation and interdisciplinarity. Finally, I discuss the origins of our research group which, in the zeitgeist of modern researching and due to the research proposal to the DFG, tried to find an innovative approach to the term mobility in an interdisciplinary setting.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18438Content2016-10-20T10:15:03+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18437Impressum2016-10-20T10:15:01+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18436Titel2016-10-20T10:14:59+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18434Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-10-20T10:14:58+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18433Regieren in der Planstadt. Raum, Wissen und Macht in der »Ville Contemporaine«2016-10-20T10:14:56+02:00Claudio Altenhainbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deLe Corbusier‟s Ville Contemporaine has frequently been quoted as a major example of “authoritarian <br />high modernism” and often serves as a negative foil for present-day approaches to urban planning. Diverging from this line of normatively charged approaches, the present article sets the groundwork for a “critique” which emancipates the Ville Contemporaine from its creator and places it at the crossroads of contemporary discourses problematizing urban agglomerations. The aim is to scrutinize the epistemic preconditions of Le Corbusier‟s approach <br />towards urban planning in order to better understand the “answer” he gave by designing the Ville Contemporaine. The article identifies three main axes of reasoning: first, the bird‟s eye as a mode of abstraction and an imperative of “ordering” intervention; second, statistical representations of traffic as well as population and the prognostic evidence emanating from them; third, a “physiological” conceptualization of the city and the consequent necessity of enforcing “(re)organization”.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18432Content2016-10-20T10:14:55+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18431Impressum2016-10-20T10:14:53+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18430Titel2016-10-20T10:14:52+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18428Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-10-20T10:14:50+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18426Die ersten zwei Jahrhunderte römischer Geschichtsschreibung: Entwicklungslinien – Bedingungen – Besonderheiten2016-10-20T10:14:48+02:00Uwe Walterbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deSince they started writing during the Hannibalic war Roman historians used to take a Romecentered <br />view of the world. The paper summerizes the most salient features of the first two centuries of Roman historical writing systematically, treating the causes and prerequisites of its emerging, literary and cultural contexts, and the specific annalistic structure of the later narratives, though Roman historical writing up to and including Livy cannot be subsumed under the umbrella term ‘annalistic’. The development of the genre was in the main determined by individual authors and their works, at its conclusion, in Sallust and Livy it produced <br />authors whose works offered to the Renaissance and the French Revolution archetypes of civic virtue and its decay.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18425Die Römische Republik als Kultur des Erinnerns, Deutens und Vergessens2016-10-20T10:14:47+02:00Yvonne Baumannbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deBolko Fietzbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deRoxana Kathbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deMichaela Rückerbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deChristine Taubebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThis paper addresses the cultural memory of the Roman Republic through a cross-cultural perspective/approach. It contrasts the mechanisms of remembering within the Roman republican society and in Athens in the 5th century BC starting with some general remarks to the <br />present discussion of different types of memory. A main point of the research is the relationship between remembering and forgetting and its importance/consequences for the construction <br />of identity. Another question is the possibility of a distinct culture and memory of the populus in contrast to the nobility and their possible places/media of remembrance, in myth and festivity.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18424Editorial2016-10-20T10:14:45+02:00Michaela Rückerbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18423Content2016-10-20T10:14:40+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18422Impressum2016-10-20T10:14:39+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18421Titel2016-10-20T10:14:37+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18180Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-10-20T10:14:36+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18179Die AutorInnen2016-10-20T10:14:34+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18176„Organisationales Lernen“ und Lernen über „Geschichte als Argument“ bei nichtstaatlichen Gewaltakteuren. Das Beispiel der FARC-EP in Kolumbien2016-10-20T10:14:33+02:00Heidrun ZineckerBemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThe central point of the article is the Colombian FARC-EP, the oldest and, by members, the largest guerrilla and therefore one of the most important non-state violent actors in Latin America. Its potentials for peace- and violence-learning will be analyzed in a normative but at the same time open perspective. The theoretical foundation is a learning model based upon the theory of “organizational learning” and learning by “history as an argument”. The research period reaches from the founding of the guerrilla 1964 until the present. The relationship <br />to each other will be shown between “organizational learning” and learning by “history as an argument”, and both of them to peace- and violence-learning, whether the one type of learning withstands compared to the other, respectively when and how the one is <br />questioning the other and which role does this play for the peace negotiations in 2012/2013.2015-01-15T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18174Gewalt und Erinnerung. Die „Gegenwart der Vergangenheit“ im nordossetisch-inguschetischen Gewaltkonflikt2016-10-20T10:14:31+02:00Dana JiroušBemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThis paper analyzes processes of remembrance as a legitimizing ressource in the mobilization process of the Ingush-Ossetian violent conflict (1992). The analysis of collective remembrance in this conflict shows that there are four principles that the ingush conflict actors use in order to legitimize their claims to the territory of Prigorodnyj Rajon. These four principles are also found in the narratives of former inhabitants of the disputed territory. The study shows that narratives of the inhabitants' parents or grandparents complete and strengthen the publicly used memory-based arguments. Reasoning based on collective remembrance is particularly convincing when public representations of the past (collective memory) overlap with individual and communicative remembrance. In addition, processes of communicative remembrance do not only transfer concrete representations of past events but also emotions from one generation to the next that the latter adopt against the background of their own experiences. In conclusion, to contain violent conflicts one has to consider processes of remembrance as potentially mobilizing factors in the escalation of ethnic conflicts. Doing this it is essential to look at collective remembrance at societal level as well as individual and communicative remembrance.2015-01-15T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18166Organisationales Lernen im Kontext von Gewalteinhegungsprozessen. Die Polizeimissionen in Bosnien-Herzegowina und Mazedonien2016-10-20T10:14:30+02:00Stefanie RämmlerBemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deIt is generally agreed that political actors can learn. If we define international organizations as political actors, and not as instruments as most theories of international relations do this, than they should also have the ability to learn. But how do international organizations learn? In the article, I answer this question by using a model of organizational learning. I examine the trigger for learning, actors of learning, the learning process and the objective of learning.<br />Against this background, I identify two research gaps: the one is the question, why individual learning becomes organizational learning, and the other is, why an organization learns in the quality of a double-loop. By analyzing different successful and unsuccessful learning processes in the police missions in Bosnia-Herzegovina (UNMIBH, EUPM) and Macedonia (Proxima) concerning the containment of violence between 1995 and 2006, I verify structural <br />differences concerning hierarchy, centralization and the division of labor which have an impact on the connection between individual and organizational learning, and I show which external factors influence double-loop learning.2015-01-15T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18164Gewaltpraxis zwischen Kultur, Kognition und Ökonomie. Das Beispiel der Jugendbanden in El Salvador2016-10-20T10:14:28+02:00Hannes Warneckebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deTheoretically, this article focuses on the causes of the social organization of violence. Whereas approaches of political economy accentuate context conditions and changing opportunities for the use of violence, cultural approaches centre on the narratives of the violent act and therefore on the description of violence. Linking both arguments through the recourse on new insights first in cognitive science and second in practice theory allows explaining forms of violence, hence, the social organization of violence through time and space. It is further argued that the reproduction of practices of violence heavily depends on the appropriation of symbolical as well as material resources. At the same time, specific cultural schemata need to be activated. Therefore, the explanation of the social organization of violence is rooted in the interplay of both levels. Taking Salvadorian youth gangs as an example, <br />this article applies the elaborated theoretical approach to show firstly how youth gangs evolved with the organization of symbolical resources and on traditional cultural schemata. Second, the dynamics of these youth gangs are illustrated and their subsequent transformation towards local violent broker accentuated.Copyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18161Vorwort2016-10-20T10:14:27+02:00Heidrun Zineckerbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18159Impressum2016-10-20T10:14:25+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/18158Titel2016-10-20T10:14:24+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2015 Working Papers Contested Order/ eAQUA Working Papershttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17588Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-11-14T10:50:33+01:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17586Human Rights Language as an Instrument. An Analysis of the Sex Work Discourse in South Africa with a Focus on Human Rights2017-09-08T09:13:52+02:00Ulrike Lühebemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deThis paper addresses and investigates the ways sex work is being discussed in South Africa. The main focus is on the human rights discourse as applied by the South African parliament and the non-governmental organisation SWEAT (Sex Worker Education and Advocacy Taskforce). The research proceeds by analysing which human rights the two actors refer to and which discursive strategies they apply in order to pursue their varying agendas. This also includes a discussion of which actors are seen as violating sex workers’ human rights and preliminary conclusions on the agendas and objectives that might be underlying the respective discourses. The paper’s analysis indicates that human rights, here, are not an end in themselves, but rather a means to an end. Both actors utilise the very same human rights language with quite different effects and outcomes, which leads to conclusions about the instrumentality of human rights.Copyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17583Content2017-12-01T09:10:16+01:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17582Impressum2016-10-20T10:14:18+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17581Titel2016-10-20T10:14:16+02:00Die RedaktionBemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.de2014-12-12T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17560Overview of the Working Papers published in the Working Paper Series of the Research Area CONTESTED ORDER2016-10-20T10:14:15+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17558Die freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung und ihre Feinde – Anmerkungen zur Autorität des Rechts2016-10-20T10:14:13+02:00Sarah SchulzBemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deDer folgende Beitrag geht anhand der aktuellen Diskussion um die ‚Extremismusklausel‛ in den Programmen gegen ‚Rechtsextremismus‛ der Bundesregierung und des sächsischen Innenministeriums der Frage nach, woher ein Bezug auf Recht und Verfassung bzw. Bundesverfassungsgericht in politischen Debatten Autorität gewinnt. Antworten auf diese Frage <br />werden in der deutschen Staatsrechtstheorie sowie den Annahmen zur politischen Kultur gesucht. Vor allem aber wird der theoretische Ansatz von Jacques Derrida herangezogen. Mittels seiner Aussagen lassen sich ein mystischer Grund der Autorität und eine aporetische Struktur des Rechts darstellen. Recht auto-autorisiert sich, benötigt dennoch stetige Bejahung. Diese Bejahung kann auch das geforderte Bekenntnis zur freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung sein, dass in der ‚Extremismusklausel‛ unterschrieben werden soll. Dieses Bekenntnis soll Demokratie schützen. Versteht man aber Demokratie im Derridaschen Sinne als eine entgrenzte, kommende, wird klar, dass eine Beschränkung ebenjener – und sei es auf eine freiheitlich demokratische Grundordnung – das verursacht, was es vorgibt, vermeiden zu wollen: die Zerstörung der Demokratie.2014-12-11T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17557Content2016-10-20T10:14:12+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17556Impressum2016-10-20T10:14:10+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heideberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/17555Titel2016-10-20T10:14:08+02:00Die Redaktionbemmann@ub.uni-heidelberg.deCopyright (c) 2014 Working Papers Contested Orderhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15672Herodotzitate in Plutarchs De malignitate Herodoti aus eAQUA2016-10-20T10:12:56+02:00Corinna Willkommenjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15671Editionsvergleich Alkibiadesvita2016-10-20T10:12:55+02:00Markus Klangjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15670Editionsvergleich Periklesvita2016-10-20T10:12:54+02:00Sebastian Blascheckjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15669Editionsvergleich und Auswertung Kimonvita2016-10-20T10:12:53+02:00Marie Lemserjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15668Editionsvergleich Aristeidesvita2016-10-20T10:12:52+02:00Kevin Straßburgerjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15667Editionsvergleich Themistoklesvita2016-10-20T10:12:51+02:00Catherine Langjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15666Auswertung De malignitate Herodoti2016-10-20T10:12:50+02:00Charlotte Schubertjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.deCorinna Willkommenjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15665Auswertung Alkibiadesvita2016-10-20T10:12:49+02:00Markus Klangjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15663Auswertung Periklesvita2016-10-20T10:12:48+02:00Sebastian Blascheckjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15662Auswertung Aristeidesvita2016-10-20T10:12:47+02:00Kevin Straßburgerjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15661Auswertung Themistoklesvita2016-10-20T10:12:46+02:00Catherine Langjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15660III.5 Untersuchungen mit dem Citationsgraphen von eAQUA zu Plutarchs Alkibiadesvita2016-10-20T10:12:45+02:00Markus Klangjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15659III.4 Untersuchungen mit dem Citationsgraphen von eAQUA zur Periklesvita des Plutarch2016-10-20T10:12:44+02:00Sebastian Blaschekjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15658III.3 Untersuchungen mit dem Citationsgraphen von eAQUA zur Kimonvita des Plutarch2016-10-20T10:12:43+02:00Marie Lemserjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15657III.2 Untersuchungen mit dem Citationsgraphen von eAQUA zur Aristeidesvita des Plutarch2016-10-20T10:12:41+02:00Kevin Straßburgerjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/15656III.1 Untersuchungen mit dem Citationsgraphen von eAQUA zur Themistoklesvita des Plutarch2016-10-20T10:12:40+02:00Catherine Langjens.wittig@uni-leipzig.de2014-07-28T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11597AutorInnen2016-10-20T10:14:07+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11596Glossar2016-10-20T10:14:05+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11595Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:14:04+02:00Almut SkrochEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11594Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:14:02+02:00Oliver BräckelEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11593Quellenangabe2016-10-20T10:14:00+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11592eAQUA Working Paper Series2016-10-20T10:13:59+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11591Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:57+02:00Corina WillkommenEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11590Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:56+02:00Sonnhild WeirauchEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11589Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:54+02:00Kevin StraßburgerEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11588Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:53+02:00Kathleen SchröterEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11587Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:51+02:00Jana MüllerEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11586Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:50+02:00Catherine LangEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11585Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:49+02:00Binia GolubEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11584Visualisierung der Kleisthenischen Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:47+02:00Keith EckardtEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11583Visualisierung und Wissensrepräsentation: Die kleisthenische Phylenreform2016-10-20T10:13:46+02:00Charlotte SchubertEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deOliver BräckelEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deCorina WillkommenEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deThe papers in this volume of the Working Papers Contested Order examine the field of information visualization and address a number of issues concerning the visual representation of political order. It takes as starting point the reform of the political organization in Athens 508/7 B.C. embarking on the discussion of different possibilities of visualization. The papers presented here form part of a larger study of the eAQUA project, published in Working Papers Contested Order No.1 & 3 & 7 & 9.2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11582Content2016-10-20T10:13:44+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11581Impressum2016-10-20T10:13:42+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11580Titel2016-10-20T10:13:41+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-10T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11577Content2016-10-20T10:13:39+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11576Impressum2016-10-20T10:13:38+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11575Die Alexanderhistoriker Ephippos von Olynth (FGrH 126) und Nikobule (FGrH 127) in eAQUA2016-10-20T10:13:36+02:00Patrick PfeilEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deThis article deals with the authors Ephippos of Olynth and Nikobule who wrote texts about the king Alexander the Great as contemporaries of Alexander. These texts are delivered only as fragments, mostly by Athenaios, and were put together by Felix Jacoby in his fragment collection (Ephippos FGrH 126 and Nikobule FGrH 127). Both authors are known in the research discussion as very hostile to Alexander. This appraisal is discussed and revalued in the following article. New methods (searching mask and Citationsgraph) from the project<br />eAQUA were used. Thus a new arrangement of the fragments of Ephippos is suggested. In addition, a fragment that was found in the text of Athenaios can also be proved in Eustathios of Thessalonike. This new fragment must be added to the collection to Ephippos.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11574Quellenangabe2016-10-20T10:13:35+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11573eAQUA Working Paper Series2016-10-20T10:13:33+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11572Titel2016-10-20T10:13:32+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11571Quellenangabe2016-10-20T10:13:31+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11570eAQUA Working Paper Series2016-10-20T10:13:29+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11569Das Mental Maps-Interface: Erforschung von Konzepten in Raum und Zeit2016-10-20T10:13:28+02:00Roxana KathEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deFor the eAQUA sub-project Mental Maps there was a need for a practical visualization that allows discovering concept change in time and space within larger amounts of data. The new tool should help to answer the following questions: When and where was a concept born? How did it spread? What authors referred to it? What was its original meaning? Were there any discursive controversies? When and under what circumstances did it disappear?<br />The Mental Maps Web Frontend was developed in cooperation between the Department of Ancient History Leipzig, the Department of Natural Language Processing Leipzig, the Department of Image and Signal Processing Leipzig and the Center for Retrospective Digitization Göttingen (GDZ). A first prototype was created based on the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae (TLG) and can be accessed under: http://www.eaqua.net/sti/. As a result of the work of the Mental Maps project the Web Frontend shows the great benefits<br />of interdisciplinary collaboration between the humanities and computer sciences. The new methods can be adapted by other humanities and social sciences for instance to analyze political, social or cultural discourses. After integrating additional corpora and associated meta-data the Mental Maps could be used for any kind of analysis of transfer and reception<br />processes in philosophy, literature or even art as well. The following Paper explores the possibilities of this new research tool on the eAQUAplatform.<br />It explains the different objects and functions of the Web Frontend and shows how to use them.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11568eAQUA: Text als „Wissensrohstoff?“2016-10-20T10:13:26+02:00Michaela RückerEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deThe following article summarizes the main results of the last three years working on the eAQUA project – an interdisciplinary collaboration between computer science and classical studies. The work is based on the notion of text as a resource of knowledge (“Wissensrohstoff”). By using the methods of text mining, that means automatic analysis methods, new results should be found and unexpected connections should be identified. The developed tools are not new in computer science but the benefit lies in the more efficient work with the ancient texts. The paper gives also a short preview to the development of the eHumanities infrastructure that will be coordinated by CLARIN-Europe. At the same time a new project - “Dissemination” - begins, which follows eAQUA. So the results of eAQUA will be continued on a permanent basis in a close cooperation with other colleagues.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11567Detailed description of eAQUA search portal2016-10-20T10:13:25+02:00Charlotte SchubertEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deIn order to perform a search for a simple word or a conjunction of multiple words there is in classics currently some established software available (e.g. Diogens by P. Heslin, the Text Search function of TLG-online, Pandora). The search functions of newer text mining methods are going further by offering the potential to show syntagmatic contexts. If two terms are occurring together in at least one local context they are in a relationship that can be denominated as syntagmatic context. The search function of eAQUA is based on this fact. By typing a term in the search mask results of this kind are displayed as a graph visualization<br />(graphical display of a word net of sentence cooccurrences) and as lists of significant cooccurrences and neighborhood cooccurrences (both ordered by significance). With the help of examples derived from the project work in eAQUA (e.g. rare cooccurrences) shall be elucidated below which new and innovative potentials for the modus operandi of classicists are gained from the use of this search method.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11566Documentation for the use of the eAQUA function 'explorative search'2016-10-20T10:13:23+02:00André BünteEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deThe aim of this article is to provide a concise and comprehendible technical documentation of the eAQUA tool "explorative search" for students and scholars of classical and ancient studies. So in plain terms it shall be described what kind of information the user obtains, how this information is generated and which conclusions might be drawn from it. This pattern has been implanted in the composition of this technical documentation, which consists of four parts. First the functionality is on focus followed by the description of the results and thirdly by the definition of these results. To round it off the fourth part will show the analysis of these results and give possibilities to interpret them for a subsequent integration into the further work.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11565Klassische Altertumswissenschaften, Digital Classics und das Feld des „new media encounter“2016-10-20T10:13:21+02:00Charlotte SchubertEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.deThe field of the new media encounter is a narrative of long duration in the context of modernization and progress discourses, which starts in classical antiquity with Plato's myth of Theuth (Plat.Prot.) and is continued until today, e.g. in Lévi-Strauss' Tristes Tropiques (A World on the Wane). In the Digital Classics which constitute a new field in this encounter we can see the possibilities of the multi-dimensionality - here the conditions of order and arrangement of texts are discussed, but also the change in forms of representation. The position of the project eAQUA within the discussion of digital media is analyzed and some of the<br />perspectives are discussed which have emerged from the project work: cooccurrence search, the systematization of chance (serendipity), rare incidents and new ways of contextualizing the chronological and spatial visualization.2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11564Content2016-10-20T10:13:20+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11563Impressum2016-10-20T10:13:19+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11562Titel2016-10-20T10:13:17+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11561Quellenangabe2016-10-20T10:13:16+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaftenhttps://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/eaqua-wp/article/view/11560eAQUA Working Paper Series2016-10-20T10:13:14+02:00Die RedaktionEgetenmeyr@stud.uni-heidelberg.de2013-12-04T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2014 eAQUA Working Papers @ Digitale Altertumswissenschaften