https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm <p>JDDM publiziert Forschungsergebnisse zu Entscheidungefindung und Problemlösen von menschlichen Individuen und Teams in komplexen und dynamischen Umgebungen. Das umfasst (unter anderem) Forschung zu Dynamischer Entscheidungsfindung, Komplexem Problemlösen, Kollaborativem Problemlösen, und Weisheit</p> Heidelberg University Publishing en-US Journal of Dynamic Decision Making 2365-8037 <div><p> </p><p>Papers accepted for publication in JDDM will be published under the following Creative Commons licence <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" rel="license">(Please click on the icon for more details</a>):</p><p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" rel="license"><img style="border-width: 0;" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag" /></a></p><p> </p><p>Authors are allowed to hold copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.</p></div> https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm/article/view/90705 <p>The current study explores the effects of a brief training program on complex problem solving (CPS) and dynamic decision making (DDM) performance in two computer-simulated tasks with different task characteristics, ChocoFine (N = 76) and WinFire (N = 99). Half of the participants in each simulation group received a brief training on 16 frequent CPS and DDM errors. We hypothesized that participants who received the training in errors would show better performance, report fewer errors, and show fewer behavioral errors compared to those who did not receive the error training prior to the start of the simulated tasks. The results showed that participants in both training groups had better performance scores. Participants in the training condition reported fewer self-reported errors compared to the no-training group only in the ChocoFine simulation. Regarding behavioral errors, status-quo bias was related to weaker performance in both simulations. These findings have implications for leaders who are prone for the status-quo bias and for organizations which could implement trainings programs for DDM and CPS.</p> C. Dominik Güss Joanna Hermida Copyright (c) 2024 C. Dominik Güss, Joanna Hermida http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 2024-05-23 2024-05-23 10 1 1 10.11588/jddm.2024.1.90705