RIHA Journal https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal <p>RIHA, the International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art, has launched the RIHA Journal in 2010. It is a peer-reviewed and <a href="https://open-access.net/informationen-zu-open-access">Open Access</a> e-journal devoted to the full range of the history of art and visual culture. The RIHA Journal especially welcomes papers on topics relevant from a supra-local perspective, articles that explore artistic interconnections or cultural exchanges, or engage with important theoretical questions that are apt to animate the discipline. Languages of publication are English, French, German, Italian, or Spanish.</p> en-US riha-journal@zikg.eu (Dr. Andrea Lermer) effinger@ub.uni-heidelberg.de (Dr. Maria Effinger) Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 0341 Bibliografia generale https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113744 <p><span style="color: #000000;">This essential bibliography on Jan van Stinemolen's <em>Panorama of Naples</em> (1582) includes additional titles relating to the interpretation of this drawing, as well as the digitized maps annotated at the Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max Planck Institute for Art History, which were fundamental to the approach followed and exemplified in this special issue. The aim of this collaborative research project was twofold: to identify as many of the sites visualized in Stinemolen's monumental drawing as possible, and to investigate its artistic composition and intermedial construction, which revealed how this work is far from a simple snapshot of Naples in 1582.</span></p> Adrian Bremenkamp Copyright (c) 2025 Adrian Bremenkamp https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113744 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 Napoli dalle colline: città e campagna, cultura e natura nella veduta di Jan van Stinemolen (1582) https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113743 <p><span lang="EN-US">In 1582, the Dutch draughtsman Jan van Stinemolen completed a monumental panorama of the city of Naples. The distinctive feature of this work in ink on paper, which is now kept in the Albertina in Vienna, is that it does not show the conventional view of the city from the gulf, but rather from the mainland. Surprisingly, however, this original work – well known both to scholars of Neapolitan topography and to those studying Dutch drawing – has not yet received the scholarly attention nor inspired the efforts at interpretation that it merits. The contributions gathered in this issue seek to fill this gap, not least by employing new analytical tools to present fresh perspectives on the work and to highlight its distinctive qualities. They are the fruit of a collaborative research project whose distinctive hallmark is the use it makes of the digitized maps annotated at the Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max Planck Institute for Art History, which were fundamental to the approach followed and exemplified in this volume. The aim was twofold: to identify as many of the sites visualized in Stinemolen's monumental drawing as possible, and to investigate its artistic composition and intermedial construction, which revealed how this work is far from a simple snapshot of Naples in 1582. </span></p> Indice Copyright (c) 2025 Indice https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113743 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0340 Il contesto biografico e creativo della veduta panoramica di Napoli di Jan van Stinemolen https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113742 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">Jan van Stinemolen (1518–1582) is an interesting artist who remains largely unknown. As he is not mentioned in Karel van Mander's <em>Schilder-Boeck</em>, his biography must be pieced together from archival sources and remains incomplete. These sources primarily record Stinemolen's presence in the Spanish Netherlands, first in his hometown of Mechelen and later in Antwerp. The dates of his time in Naples and southern Italy – a trip to Sicily can be inferred from one of his drawings – are unclear. Like other members of his family, he was probably primarily active as a silversmith and jeweller – a prosperous profession, although he may have been affected by the religious wars in his homeland. Nothing has survived of his work as a silversmith; apart from the spectacular <em>View of Naples</em>, only a few drawings remain, most of which are attributed to him on stylistic grounds. Stinemolen's particular amalgamation of topographical map and perspectival view in this panorama may have its roots in Mechelen, where urban cartography flourished in the 16th century. His fascination with landscapes created by volcanic forces is evident in his drawings. The characteristics of his panorama allow us to form further hypotheses about his artistic motivations and his interest in natural history.</span></p> Martin Raspe Copyright (c) 2025 Martin Raspe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113742 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0339 Il sottofondo roccioso della città: osservazione della natura e caratteri insediativi nella veduta di Napoli di Jan van Stinemolen https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113741 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">In comparison with previous depictions as well as with coeval and later maps of Naples, Jan van Stinemolen's view (1582) adopts an unusual point of observation by surveying the city from the hillside to the gulf. This allows one to perceive Naples as embedded in its wider environment, ranging from Vesuvius to the Phlegraean Fields. In this context, nature plays a fundamental role, both outside and inside the city walls. As for the latter, the fortifications differ from what we know of the circuit built by Viceroy Pedro de Toledo, both in their form and the connection between the walled perimeter and the north-western urban areas. In particular, this issue and the question of topographical truth has attracted much attention in the scholarly discussion devoted to the drawing thus far. This paper aims to consider such peculiarities from a different perspective. Its point of departure is the rendering of the monumental gate facing the viewer with the oddly fashioned design that Stinemolen gave to a site where other historical sources record only a minor opening known as <em>pertuso</em>; an actual gate, the Porta Medina, was built only some sixty years later. Such seemingly inconsistent features actually match the imagery of old, more specifically ancient towns, and may thus be intentional. Furthermore, the relevance and visual variation of the bedrock, as attested by this view as well as by further drawings by Jan van Stinemolen, provide elements for examining the author's emphasis on natural phenomena peculiar to the Neapolitan region, paralleling scholarly narratives that emerged at this time within the context of a growing naturalist interest in volcanic phenomena.</span></p> Antonino Tranchina Copyright (c) 2025 Antonino Tranchina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113741 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0338 La veduta di Napoli di Jan van Stinemolen: esperienza visiva e suggestioni letterarie https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113740 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">This essay examines Jan van Stinemolen</span><span class="FunotentextZchn"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 120%;">'</span></span><span lang="EN-US">s view of Naples by moving beyond the traditional comparison with historical cartography. Unlike the maps by Du Perac/Lafréry (1566) and Baratta (1627), which were conceived with a primarily topographical intent, Stinemolen</span><span class="FunotentextZchn"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 120%;">'</span></span><span lang="EN-US">s drawing is interpreted as a visual device evoking in the viewer the experience of a panoramic vista. Within this framework, several features previously regarded as distortions or omissions in the city</span><span class="FunotentextZchn"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 120%;">'</span></span><span lang="EN-US">s depiction – such as the absence of the upper Decumanus as well as the duplication or displacement of certain buildings – can be reconsidered. The parallel with sixteenth- and seventeenth-century published descriptions of Naples suggests alternative modes of engagement, prompting the viewer to enter imaginatively into the urban space. The adoption of multiple viewpoints is linked to the setting on the northern hills, which shaped the city into a kind of </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; color: black; background: white;">"</span><span lang="EN-US">theatre</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; color: black; background: white;">"</span><span lang="EN-US"> – a recurrent topos in early modern accounts of Naples – without privileging a single vantage point but rather combining plausible views into a unified portrait, in line with Stinemolen</span><span class="FunotentextZchn"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 120%;">'</span></span><span lang="EN-US">s visual rhetoric and with the literary renown of the city in the sixteenth century.</span></p> Stefano D'Ovidio Copyright (c) 2025 Stefano D'Ovidio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113740 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0337 Napoli come "Weltlandschaft" https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113739 <p>Stinemolen's panorama of Naples reverses the traditional representation model by showing the city as seen from the countryside. It stages a view of the city, the sea, and the horizon framed by <em>repoussoirs</em>. This article identifies the Dutch <em>Weltlandschaft</em> ("world landscape") and the inventions of the Danube school, particularly the paintings and prints of Albrecht Altdorfer, as the medial preconditions for this novel image creation, which also exhibits affinities with contemporary literary preconceptions of the view of the city, as documented in Giovanni Tarcagnota's <em>Del sito, et lodi della città di Napoli</em> (1566). The unusual ambition of Stinemolen's panorama of Naples can be better understood when compared with Anton van den Wyngaerde's drawing of Naples and his series of depictions of Spanish cities commissioned by Philip II, which were probably created as templates for a printed city atlas. Stinemolen and his patron may have been planning a large-format print similar to Wyngaerde's engraving of Genoa. Regardless of this presumed practical function, Stinemolen attempts to emulate the atmospheric effects of landscape painting in the medium of drawing without abandoning the claim to topographical precision and accurate representation of individual buildings. The conflicting demands of cartographic and landscape representation thus appear to be dialectically absorbed in the virtuosity of the drawing. The result is the creation of a larger-than-life visual experience that offers a view of the city impossible to capture from any specific, actual location on Naples's periphery.</p> Adrian Bremenkamp Copyright (c) 2025 Adrian Bremenkamp https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113739 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0336 Opportunità e limiti dell'annotazione digitale di mappe e vedute storiche https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113738 <p lang="en-US">A view of Naples by Jan van Stinemolen forms part of a digitization project that has been carried out at the Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max Planck Institute for Art History since 2017. The aim is to provide public access to selected historical maps and views of the city scenically located on the Gulf of Naples through interactive web applications. In these applications, all objects identified by numbers or inscriptions have been marked, annotated, and enriched with metadata using vector graphics. The <em>Mappa topografica della città di Napoli e de' suoi contorni</em> by the Duca di Noja (1775) served as the central reference for all subsequent digitizations, as it offers more valuable information for the identification of sites within the urban space and its rural surroundings in Early Modern Naples than any other historical map of the city. Jan van Stinemolen's panorama presents a challenge because it lacks an accompanying legend. This article uses Stinemolen's view of Naples not only as a compelling example of the ways in which digital web applications can work with historical source material, but also as an opportunity for discussing the potentials and limitations of such innovative analytical methods.</p> Grit Heidemann-Schirmer Copyright (c) 2025 Grit Heidemann-Schirmer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113738 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0335 Premessa https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113737 <p><span style="color: #0d0d0d;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;">In 1582, the Dutch draughtsman Jan van Stinemolen completed a monumental panorama of the city of Naples. The distinctive feature of this work in ink on paper, which is now kept in the Albertina in Vienna, is that it does not show the conventional view of the city from the gulf, but rather from the mainland. Surprisingly, however, this original work – well known both to scholars of Nea</span></span><span style="color: #0d0d0d;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;">politan topography and to those studying Dutch drawing – has not yet received adequate interpretative attention. The contributions gathered in this issue seek to fill this gap, employing new analytical tools to present fresh perspectives on the work and to highlight its distinctive qualities.</span></span></p> Tanja Michalsky Copyright (c) 2025 Tanja Michalsky https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113737 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0342 "Il cordone in fin della scarpa fa bel vedere": On the Purpose of the Cordon in Fortification Architecture https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113528 <p>In Early Modern fortifications, the cordon typically takes the form of a semi-circular projecting band positioned at the top of the scarp, marking the transition between the sloped base and the upper vertical wall. This study focuses on the controversial question of whether the cordon served an aesthetic purpose or rather a strictly functional one. The idea of a practical function originated with Francesco di Giorgio Martini (15th century), who imagined that a specially shaped cordon could prevent the enemy from scaling the ramparts with ladders. Through an analysis primarily of treatises by 16th- and 17th-century engineers, this paper shows how they understood the role of the cordon in the fortifications of their time.</p> Andrej Žmegač Copyright (c) 2025 Andrej Žmegač https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113528 Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0100 0325 "Barbara Radziwiłł" and "Princess Tarakanova" at the 1867 Exposition Universelle https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113264 <p>At the 1867 <em>Exposition Universelle</em> in Paris, a competition for public sympathy unfolded within the Russian section between two paintings – Józef Simmler’s <em>The Death of Barbara Radziwiłł</em> and Konstantin Flavitsky’s <em>Princess Tarakanova</em>. Flavitsky worked in Saint Petersburg, while Simmler was based in Warsaw, in the so-called Kingdom of Poland (commonly known as Congress Poland), then part of the Russian Empire. This paper examines how their depictions of beautiful, dying women reflected the collective memory and political concerns of the Polish and Russian nations. Additionally, by drawing on archival documents, it investigates the selection and censorship of paintings for the Russian section of the <em>Exposition Universelle</em>. It also analyzes French critics’ responses to <em>Barbara Radziwiłł</em> and <em>Princess Tarakanova</em>. In doing so, the paper traces how the reception of these works evolved across various national contexts.</p> Maria Chernysheva Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Chernysheva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/113264 Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0200 Vorwort der Gastherausgeber:innen https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112050 <p>Monographs on architects constitute an established and largely unquestioned format within architectural scholarship. This special issue examines the diverse motivations behind the production of such publications, as well as the sources, media, and modes of presentation they employ, with a focus on case studies from Central Europe. It brings together a selection of contributions from the conference "Architekt:innen-Monographien – Potentiale, Grenzen, Alternativen", held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna on 23 September 2021.</p> Ruth Hanisch, Richard Kurdiovsky, Bernadette Reinhold, Antje Senarclens de Grancy Copyright (c) 2025 Ruth Hanisch, Richard Kurdiovsky, Bernadette Reinhold, Antje Senarclens de Grancy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112050 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0332 Frühe Schinkel-Monographien https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112034 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">This article examines German architectural monographs from the first half of the nineteenth century, using the example of the Prussian state architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel. While tributes to architects in the generation preceding Schinkel were typically limited to posthumous obituaries, by the time of the post-Napoleonic bourgeois transformation and nation formation after the Congress of Vienna, an architect like Schinkel could already expect extensive public recognition in journals during his lifetime, from both art historians and professional peers. These writings clearly also served as a means of assessing national cultural achievement in the representative sphere of the arts.</span></p> <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">In the Vormärz period, motifs and narrative strategies drawn from Romantic literature were employed to promote a bourgeois ideal of the artist – an ideal that left a particularly strong mark on representations of Schinkel. The architect was already perceived during his lifetime more as an autonomous artist than as a Prussian civil servant, even though he ascended through all ranks of state service over several decades, ultimately becoming <em>Oberlandesbaudirektor</em> (Director of Public Works), a position from which he significantly shaped architecture throughout Prussia. Moreover, the early monographs on Schinkel were apparently imbued with historical-philosophical ideas concerning the transhistorical significance of his artistry.</span></p> Elke Katharina Wittich Copyright (c) 2025 Elke Katharina Wittich https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112034 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 Architekt:innen-Monographien. Kanonisierung, Kontextualisierung, Kritik https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112032 <p>Monographs on architects are a well-established and largely unquestioned format within the academic discipline of architectural history. This special issue examines the various motivations behind the writing of such works, along with the sources, media, and modes of presentation they employ, drawing on case studies from Central Europe. At the heart of this inquiry lies the question of who is considered 'worthy' of a monograph—an issue shaped by hegemonies of gender, origin, and religion. Ultimately, these investigations prompt a broader reflection on the processes through which the architectural canon is constructed.</p> Inhaltsverzeichnis Copyright (c) 2025 Richard Kurdiovsky https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112032 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0326 Architekt:innen-Monographien. Zur Revision eines wissenschaftlichen Publikationsformats https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112031 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">This article examines the origins of the monograph as a publication format dedicated to individual architects and explores how such person-centered narratives in architectural history are, or might be, written today in light of contemporary concerns such as gender equality and hegemonic discourses, including those addressed in postcolonial critique. Originally conceived as a means of honouring exclusively male and European architects and artists, the diversity among the authors of these publications was also very limited in the early days. The article poses critical questions: Who is deemed worthy of a monograph and thereby integrated into the architectural canon? What values and hierarchies are reinforced through such recognition? What roles do the various actors involved – the monograph’s author, those working in archives, collections, and publishing houses – play in shaping these narratives? The article offers a critical reassessment of the monograph as a traditional scholarly format, while also highlighting its potential to support a more interconnected and contextually grounded approach to architectural historiography.</span></p> Ruth Hanisch, Richard Kurdiovsky, Bernadette Reinhold, Antje Senarclens de Grancy Copyright (c) 2025 Ruth Hanisch, Richard Kurdiovsky, Bernadette Reinhold, Antje Senarclens de Grancy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/112031 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0334 Architekt:innen-Monographien im Residenz Verlag https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110611 <p>Astrid Graf-Wintersberger im Gespräch mit Richard Kurdiovsky</p> <p>The following interview, conducted by Richard Kurdiovsky in June and July 2022 with Astrid Graf-Wintersberger – editor at Residenz Verlag, Salzburg, from 1987 and its programme director until 2006, as well as co-editor of the publisher’s 2006 anniversary Festschrift – aims, in the spirit of oral history, to provide insights and information on monographs on architects from the perspective of a publishing house. This perspective may be shaped by different determining factors than those that govern the seemingly objective realm of academic research. The intention and expectation are that this text will serve as a contemporary document: both as a source and a stimulus for future research. It addresses questions regarding the role of publishers in the academic process and in cultural policy, in the public dissemination of architects through the medium of the art book (particularly for a broader audience), in the formation of awareness, and ultimately, in the shaping of the art historical canon.</p> Astrid Graf-Wintersberger, Richard Kurdiovsky Copyright (c) 2025 Astrid Graf-Wintersberger, Richard Kurdiovsky https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110611 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0330 Komplexe Beziehungen. Notizen zu Biographie und Werk von Friedl Dicker-Brandeis https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110609 <p>This article discusses the methodological approaches for writing a monograph that links the life and work of an individual engaged in the arts, using the example of Friedl Dicker-Brandeis (1898–1944). It advocates for a productive interweaving of biographical construction and work-centered study, critically reflecting on the diversity of the textual, visual and material sources and their varying availability, condition, and framing. Through selected life stages and exemplary analyses of her work, the article explores the complex interrelations between the societal conditions that shaped Dicker-Brandeis’s work as a Jewish artist, female architect, and committed leftist intellectual up to her deportation, and her ways to position herself within, and at times against, these categorizations. In doing so, it brings together perspectives from critical biographical research with a reading of the politics of artistic practice.</p> Stefanie Kitzberger Copyright (c) 2025 Stefanie Kitzberger https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110609 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0331 Writing a Biography of a Missing Character: Friedrich Weinwurm (1885–1942?) https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110608 <p>This article introduces the life and work of Friedrich Weinwurm (1895–1942?), an architect who played a pivotal role in shaping interwar architecture in Slovakia but has remained largely absent from scholarly discourse. It outlines the methods employed in investigating his biography and oeuvre, and provides a critical overview of both key and peripheral sources, highlighting their interconnections. The findings are situated within both the broader historical context and the current state of knowledge. Furthermore, the article explains the circumstances that motivated the author to prepare the monograph <em>Friedrich Weinwurm Architect</em> (Bratislava, 2014), situating it in relation to other monographic studies on Slovak architects active during the first half of the 20th century.</p> Henrieta Moravčíková Copyright (c) 2025 Henrieta Moravčíková https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110608 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0328 Forschung als Fortschreibung von Selbstnarrativen? https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110584 <p>The Austrian architect Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky (1897–2000) remained professionally and politically active well into old age. Nevertheless, scholarly research on her life and work has largely focused on the period before 1945, particularly on two relatively short phases: her early professional years in Red Vienna (1920–1925) and her work for the New Frankfurt public housing programme (1926–1930). This article examines how this narrowed representation of Schütte-Lihotzky’s life came into being and argues that she herself played a significant role in shaping it. Beginning in the 1970s, through her publications and media presence, she actively contributed to the construction of the image that still dominates scholarly discourse today. The article traces the development and influence of this autobiographical narrative and highlights the resulting blind spots in the existing body of research on Schütte-Lihotzky.</p> Marcel Bois Copyright (c) 2025 Marcel Bois https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110584 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0333 Eine Architektenmonographie als Abrechnung https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110570 <p>Otto Wagner was already honoured with a monograph during his lifetime. What may at first glance appear to be a tribute to the architect and his life’s work by the well-known cultural journalist Joseph August Lux reveals itself, in the context of the author’s other writings, as a relatively undisguised attack on the cultural establishment of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy and its art policies. In his Wagner monograph, Lux elaborated on the theme of the artist suffering from the incomprehension of those in power – a motif he had previously developed in several of his novels. Lux too, despite the wide circulation of his books, saw himself as a victim of cultural policy, and thus as a kindred interpreter of Wagner’s creative work and suffering.</p> Ruth Hanisch Copyright (c) 2025 Ruth Hanisch https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110570 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200 0329 Das wechselseitige Verhältnis von Architektur, Medien und Politik: Hans Scharoun 1933–1945 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110560 <p class="Abstract-text"><span lang="EN-US">As a methodological and critical response to the concept of the 'complete œuvre', this article advocates for an alternative approach: the focused analysis of a specific historical moment. Such an approach allows for a depth of engagement that is often unattainable when considering an artist’s work in its entirety. Accordingly, this study examines the complex interplay between architecture, media, and politics in the work of modernist architect Hans Scharoun during the period 1933 to 1945. The resulting analysis yields new insights, including the identification of additional artefacts – particularly performative architectural photographs – that offer a more nuanced understanding of Scharoun’s practice and position during the years of political oppression.</span></p> Waltraud P. Indrist Copyright (c) 2025 Waltraud P. Indrist https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/110560 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0200