Archives

Working Paper 7: Food and urban politics in Belo Horizonte: agroecology, activist coalitions,
and bottom-up technologies of sustainable urbanization by Nicolas Goez

In this Working Paper, I aim to contribute to the emerging debate between food and urban studies by bringing to the fore the socio-political dimension of the food system and its urban context. Guided by the general research questions of the project “Food for Justice: Power, Politics, and Food Inequalities in a Bioeconomy”, this research is embedded in a case study on food politics in the city of Belo Horizonte.
It deals with the social innovations of the agroecological and housing movements of the city and the dwellers of Izidora, inhabitants of a so-called “informal settlement”, whose engagement in the fight for housing and the right to the city has yielded remarkable achievements in building activist coalitions and re-signifying marginal urban spaces. Drawing on digital-ethnographic fieldwork I conducted between January
and December 2020, I analyze the context, use, and reach of these social innovations as an instrument to transform urban development in the peripheries of Belo Horizonte.

Working Paper 8: The impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic at the Slow Food Movement by Thalita Kalix Garcia

The corona virus outburst was declared a global pandemic in March 2020, making many countries to go on lockdown in order to try to restrain it and avoid or dimmish the overwhelming of national health systems. As work and studies went online and social distancing became a safety rule, social movements also had to adapt themselves. Furthermore, food movements gained more relevance as one of the
first concerns was to keep the food production and distribution worldwide despite the shutdowns. This paper aims to analyse the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the Slow Food movement, how it changed the movement organization, agenda, and actions. It is based on empirical research in two countries: Brazil and Germany and it looks at three moments of the pandemic, from its first impact in 2020 till the adaptations and continuities in 2021 and 2022. This work relies on an on-site and virtual ethnography and is part of a broader investigation on the movement on both countries.

Working Paper 9: Políticas de segurança alimentar e nutricional nos municípios brasileiros

Esta publicação registra ideias centrais que emergiram em torno da atividade autogestionada “Política de Segurança alimentar e nutricional no âmbito municipal: contexto e oportunidades”, realizada de forma virtual no V Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (V  ENPSSAN, 2022). Garantir o Direito Humano à Alimentação Adequada e o alcance das políticas públicas de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (SAN) passam, necessariamente, por reconhecer o papel central dos municípios na execução de ações e construção de diálogos locais, de forma integrada com os demais poderes públicos e áreas governamentais, como propõe o Sistema Nacional de SAN. No debate emergiram reflexões sobre monitoramento da segurança/insegurança alimentar populacional, definições e conceitos associados às políticas públicas de SAN, relatos de experiências municipais, bem como oportunidades para a retomada e fortalecimento das políticas de SAN nos municípios. Foram identificados oito potenciais enfoques para contribuir com o campo de pesquisas sobre políticas públicas de SAN no contexto municipal: governança participativa; diversidade territorial e a relação rural-urbano; institucionalidades; atuação da sociedade civil; intersetorialidade; escalas e distintas  espacialidades; interface com a agenda socioecológica; e capacidades estatais. Por fim, identificou-se também temas e alguns desafios para a efetividade das políticas de SAN municipais. Este documento  traz contribuições coletivas às distintas janelas de oportunidades que atualmente se encontram em frente aos diversos atores sociais envolvidos nas políticas de SAN municipais. Neste sentido, destacamos a retomada da agenda pública guiada e fortalecida pelo Governo Federal (a partir de 2023), a retomada do Consea nacional e a ocorrência, em 2024, de eleições municipais.

Working Paper 10: Kurzauswertung Befragung „Wir haben es satt!“ 2024

Seit 2011 findet jährlich zum Auftakt der Agrarmesse Grüne Woche in Berlin die Demonstration „Wir haben es satt!“ des Bündnisses Meine Landwirtschaft statt. Das Bündnis setzt sich für eine nachhaltige und faire Landwirtschaft und Lebensmittelproduktion ein und fordert die Agrar- und Ernährungswende. Die Fallstudie „Wir haben es satt!“ ist Teil des Projektes der BMBF-Nachwuchsgruppe Food for Justice: Food for Justice: Power, Politics and Food Inequalities in a Bioeconomy am Heidelberg Centrum für Ibero-Amerika-Studien (HCIAS) der Universität Heidelberg. Das Projekt untersucht verschiedene Achsen der Ungleichheiten im Bereich der Ernährung in unterschiedlichen Maßstäben und räumlichen Gegebenheiten sowie deren Dynamiken der Reproduktion und des Wandels in der Ernährungspolitik. Die Fallstudie „Wir haben es satt!“ untersucht die zentralen Gerechtigkeitsforderungen, die Bürger*innen dazu mobilisieren, Ernährungsungleichheiten anzuprangern und alternative Ernährungspolitiken in verschiedenen Weltregionen zu fordern. Am 20. Januar 2024 haben Forscherinnen von Food for Justice mit Unterstützung freiwilliger Interviewenden eine Befragung mit Beteiligten der „Wir haben es satt!“-Demonstration durchgeführt. Die so gewonnenen Daten geben Aufschluss über die soziodemographische Zusammensetzung der Demonstrierenden, ihre Anliegen und politischen Haltungen sowie darüber, wie sie durch ihr eigenes Konsumverhalten und ihren Lebensstil eine zukunftsfähige Landwirtschaft unterstützen. In dieser Kurzzusammenfassung werden die Methodik sowie ausgewählte Ergebnisse der Befragung vorgestellt.

Working Paper 11: Food Movements in Germany. Analysis of actors in the socio-ecological transformation of the food system

Around the world, social movements are protesting against the corporate food regime (Friedmann & McMichael, 1989), denouncing the injustices associated with its structural dynamics of neoliberal capitalism, patriarchal domination, racism, coloniality, epistemic violence, and anthropocentric exploitation (Motta, 2021b; Holt Giménez & Shattuck, 2011; Holt-Gimenez & Patel, 2012). Many food movements are calling for a socio-ecological transformation and creating alternative forms to produce, share, prepare, consume and dispose of food, based on relations of care, solidarity and respect. In their heterogeneity, they provide a good analytical lens to explore the multiple and intersectional dimensions of food inequalities denounced and the directions of change desired by organized movements from civil society (Motta, 2021a). But which are the food movements that mobilize for a socio-ecological transformation of food politics in Germany? What are the main dimensions and intersections of inequalities addressed by them?

Based on an explorative mapping, this research identifies relevant food movements in Germany, their discourses and agendas. It takes as units of analysis food movements organizations with considerable collective actions and participation in social mobilization on a national scale during the last 5 years (2018-2023). Using an analytical framework elaborated in dialogue with theoretical and conceptual works  on food movements, food inequalities, and dynamics of transformation in the food regime, the empirical data is presented along the categories: types of movements and activist discourses, time of emergence, juridical form, dimensions of food inequalities addressed, categories of intersectional inequalities considered, spatial locus of action (urban/rural), phases of the food system, sphere of social change most frequently targeted by the food movements. Based on the data, the dynamics of transformations are discussed.

Applying a qualitative and quantitative methodology which combined content analysis and coding, the research results in a mapping of the actors (Mayring & Fenzl, 2019; Saldaña, 2021). This working paper aims to give a first overview of food activism in Germany by assessing the actors in this field of social mobilisation and analysing their emancipatory potentials and limits.

Working Paper 12: Intergenerational Knot: eating meat in contexts of inequality

The Anthropocene is not only a period of rapid environmental transformation but also a prolific moment of values changes. While the temporality dimensions of this phenomenon are a challenge to social sciences inquiry, it also presents a great opportunity for new methodologies to emerge. The intergenerational knot can be a useful methodological frame for understanding social change through the discussion of different values across different generations because, at the same time, it evidences differences and disagreement; it also carries the potential of mutually influencing and multiplying new food consumption practices. The present article focuses on intergenerational discussions through the case study of meat consumption. The young generation analyzed usually prioritizes environmental impact when choosing what to eat, however, other factors exert more significant influence on the family food consumption, such as their experiences of food deprivation, their views of what a “better life” consists, and their experience of social mobility. Therefore, first-hand ethnographic data was collected from university students who negotiated between personal values and family narratives around their household meat consumption in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. The intergenerational knot becomes a useful methodological frame to understand values change in social and environmental transformation processes in an inclusive way.