Heigh-Ho: CPS and the seven questions – some thoughts on contemporary Complex Problem Solving research

  • Jens Beckmann (Author)

Identifiers (Article)


Research on complex problem solving (CPS) has reached a stage where certain standards have been achieved, whereas the future development is quite ambiguous. In this situation, the editors of the Journal of Dynamic Decision Making asked a number of representative authors to share their point of view with respect to seven questions about the relevance of (complex) problem solving as a research area, about the contribution of laboratory-based CPS research to solving real life problems, about the roles of knowledge, strategies, and intuition in CPS, and about the existence of expertise in CPS.




Beckmann, J.F. (2010). Taming a beast of burden – On some issues with the conceptualization and operationalisation of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 20, 250-264. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.024

Beckmann, J.F., & Goode, N. (2014). The benefit of being naïve and knowing it: The unfavourable impact of perceived context familiarity on learning in complex problem solving tasks. Instructional Science, 42(2), 271-290. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9280-7

Beckmann, J.F., & Guthke, J. (1995). Complex problem solving, intelligence, and learning ability. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European Perspective (pp. 177–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9781315806723

Beckmann, J.F. (2018). Deferential trespassing: Looking through and at an intersectional lens. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 161, 119-123. doi: 10.1002/cad.20243

Beckmann, J.F., & Goode, N. (2017). Missing the wood for the wrong trees: On the difficulty of defining the complexity of complex problem solving scenarios. Journal of Intelligence, 5,15. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020015

Beckmann, J.F., Birney, D.P. & Goode, N. (2017). Beyond Psychometrics: The difference between difficult problem solving and complex problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01739

Birney, D.P., Beckmann, J.F., & Seah, Y.Z. (2016). More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task and situation factors in evaluative judgments of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.007

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G.J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061

Dörner, D. & Funke, J. (2017). Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153

Gadenne, V. (1976). Die Gültigkeit psychologicher Untersuchungen [The validity of psychological inquiry]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Lewin, K. (1927). Gesetz und Experiment in der Psychologie [Law and experiment in psychology]. Symposium, 1, 375-421.

Lewin, K. (1992). Law and Experiment in Psychology. Science in Context, 5, 385-416. doi:10.1017/s0269889700001241

Mencken, H.L. (1921). Prejudices. Second Series. London: Jonathan Cape.

Wood, R.E., Cogin, J., & Beckmann, J.F. (2009) Managerial Problem Solving: Frameworks, Tools & Techniques. McGraw Hill Australia.