Quo Vadis CPS? Brief answers to big questions
Identifiers (Article)
Identifiers (Files)
Abstract
Research on complex problem solving (CPS) has reached a stage where certain standards have been achieved, whereas the future development is quite ambiguous. In this situation, the editors of the Journal of Dynamic Decision Making asked a number of representative authors to share their point of view with respect to seven questions about the relevance of (complex) problem solving as a research area, about the contribution of laboratory-based CPS research to solving real life problems, about the roles of knowledge, strategies, and intuition in CPS, and about the existence of expertise in CPS.
Statistics
![loading loading](https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/plugins/generic/hdStatistic/img/activity.gif)
References
Beckmann, J. F., Birney, D. P., & Goode, N. (2017). Beyond psychometrics: the difference between difficult problem solving and complex problem solving. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1739. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01739
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Fink, M., Timothy, V., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2019). Facilitating diagnostic competences in higher education - A meta-analysis in medical and teacher education. Educational Psychology Review, 1-40. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09492-2
Detterman, D. K. (2014). Introduction to the intelligence special issue on the development of expertise: Is ability necessary? Intelligence, 45, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.02.004
Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H.W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (Eds.). (1983). Lohhausen: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [Lohausen: On the handling of uncertainty and complexity]. Bern: Huber (Retrieved from http://www.verlag-hanshuber.com/).
Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. (2006): Denken und Urteilen unter Unsicherheit: Kognitive Heuristiken. In: Funke, J. (Hrsg.): Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Bd. C, II, 8. Denken und Problemlösen, Göttingen 2006, S. 329-374.
Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Stadler, M., & Wüstenberg, S. (2015). Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 356-382. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.989263
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., & Avvisati, F. (2015). Computer-generated log-file analyses as a window into students’ minds? A showcase study based on the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving. Computers & Education, 91, 92-105. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.018
OECD. (2010). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-6-en
Schoppek, W., & Fischer, A. (2017). Common process demands of two complex dynamic control tasks: transfer is mediated by comprehensive strategies. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2145. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02145
Stadler, M., Fischer, F., & Greiff, S. (2019). Taking a closer look: An exploratory analysis of successful and unsuccessful strategy use in complex problems. Frontiers in psychology, 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00777
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.