Students’ Expectations and Their Perception of Student-Centered Learning

Experiences from the Royal Thimphu College, Bhutan

  • Kencho Pelzom (Autor/in)
  • Kelzang Tentsho (Autor/in)
  • Chimi Yuden (Autor/in)

Abstract

Studierendenzentriertes Lernen ist deshalb ein so verbreiteter Lehr-Lernansatz, weil er Studierenden in die Lage versetzt, relevante akademische Kompetenzen zu entwickeln und Qualifikationen zu erlangen, die auf dem Arbeitsmarkt gefragt sind. Hochschulen werden zunehmend anhand ihrer direkten Verbindung zu den Ergebnissen der studentischen Lernprozesse und den auf den Arbeitsmarkt anwendbaren Qualifikationen der Absolvent*innen bewertet. Diese Qualifikationen, zu welchen Kompetenzen in Kommunikation, Technologie, Problemlösung und Reflektion gehören, fördern eigenständiges und lebenslanges Lernen. Sie gelten als grundlegende Kompetenzen, deren Erwerb Hochschulen ihren Studierenden ermöglichen sollten. In dieser Studie untersuchen wir die Präferenzen von 46 Studierenden, die in verschiedenen BWL-Programmen am Royal Thimphu College, Bhutan (RTC) eingeschrieben sind, bezüglich Lehrmethoden und Lernumfeld. Die Daten für die Studie wurden mithilfe von Gruppendiskussionen erhoben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Studierende zugängliche, aufgeschlossene und kompetente Lehrende bevorzugen, die ein sinnvolles Lernumfeld schaffen. Studierende hatten außerdem eine Präferenz für studierendenzentrierte Lehransätze wie Fallbeispiele, Rollenspiele, Gruppearbeit und Aufgaben mit realistischen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Solche studierendenzentrierten Ansätze werden am RTC angewendet. Des Weiteren beschäftigt sich dieser Artikel mit der Vielzahl an Herausforderungen für Studierende im ersten Studienjahr und deren hochschulstrategischen Implikationen.

Statistiken

loading

Literaturhinweise

BADA, S. O. 2015. “Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning”, in: Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5:6, pp. 66–70.

BALAPUMI, R., ASHLEY, A. 2012. “Concepts and factors influencing independent learning in IS higher education”, in: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–10. Deakin University.

BARRIE, S., HUGHES, C., SMITH, C. 2009. “The national graduate attributes project: Integration and assessment of graduate attributes in curriculum.” Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b37560282b963adc5a86ad3998b5346bfa04a1cf).

BARRIE, S. 2004. “A research‐based approach to generic graduate attributes policy”, in: Higher Education Research & Development, 23:3, pp. 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943604200023539.

BERÉNYI, L., DEUTSCH, N. 2018. “Effective teaching methods in business higher education: a students’ perspective”, in: International journal of education and information technologies, 12, pp. 37–45.

BIGGS, J., TANG, C. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. UK: Bell and Bain Ltd, Glasgow.

BROOKER, A., BROOKER, S., LAWRENCE, J. 2017. “First year students' perceptions of their difficulties”, in: Student Success, 8:1, pp. 49–63.

BRYANT, J. W., DARWIN, J. A. 2004. “Exploring inter-organizational relationships in the health service: an immersive drama approach”, in: European journal of operational research 152:3, pp. 655–666.

BUEDETT, J. 2003. “Making Group Work: University students’ perception”, in: International Educational Journal, 4:3, pp. 177–191.

CAGE, E., JONES, E., RYAN, G., HUGHES, G., SPANNER, L. 2021. "Student mental health and transitions into, through and out of university: student and staff perspectives", in: Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45:8, pp. 1076–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2021.1875203.

CANFIELD, A. A. 1992. Learning styles inventory (LSI) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

DAVIES, W. M. 2009. “Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions”, in: Higher education, 58, pp. 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y.

DE LA HARPE, B., DAVID, C. 2012. “Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes”, in: Higher Education Research & Development, 31:4, pp. 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.629361.

EARLE, V., THOMAS, M. 2011. Experiences of taking students on Business Trips: with recommendations for organising successful Business Trips. (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1641281.pdf).

ETIKAN, I., BALA, K. 2017. “Sampling and Sampling methods”, in: Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5:6, pp. 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149.

FRAMBACH, J. M., DRIESSEN, E. W., BEH, P., VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. P. M. 2014. “Quiet or questioning? Students' discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures”, in: Studies in Higher Education, 39:6, pp.1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754865.

GERLOFF, A., REINHARD, K. 2019. "University Offering Work-Integrated Learning Dual Study Programs", in: International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20:2, pp. 161–169. (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1226179.pdf).

GOI, C.-L. 2018. “The use of business simulation games in teaching and learning”, in: Journal of Education for Business, 94: 5, pp. 342–349.

GOW, L., KEMBER, D. 1990. “Does higher education promote independent learning?”, in: Higher education, 19:3, pp. 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133895.

GREEN, W., HAMMER, S., STAR, C. 2009. “Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?”, in: Higher Education Research & Development, 28:1, pp. 17–29.

GUNASEKARA, C. S.. 2008. "Fostering independent learning and critical thinking in management higher education using an information literacy framework", in: Journal of Information Literacy, 2:2, pp. 74–85. https://doi.org/10.11645/2.2.159.

GUNDALA, R. R., SINGH, M. 2016. “Role of simulations in student learning: A case study using marketing simulations”, in: Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 5:2, pp. 1–14.

GUPTA, S. K., SENGUPTA, N. 2021. “Webinar as the future educational tool in higher education of India: A survey-based study”, in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26:4, pp. 1111–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09493-7.

HEIN, G. E. 1991. "Constructivist learning theory." Institute for Inquiry. (http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/constructivistlearning.html).

HEUCHEMER, S., MARTINS, E., SZCZYRBA, B. 2020. "Problem-Based Learning at a Learning University: A View from the Field", in: Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14:2. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i2.2879.

HILL, J., WALKINGTO, H., FRANCE, D. 2016. “Graduate attributes: implications for higher education practice and policy”,in Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40:2, 155–163, DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2016.115493.

KAPUT, K. 2018.”Evidence for Student-Centered Learning.” Education evolving. (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581111.pdf).

KOPZHASSAROVA, U., AKBAYEVA, G., ESKAZINOVA, Z., BELGIBAYEVA, G., TAZHIKEYEVA, A. 2016. "Enhancement of Students' Independent Learning through Their Critical Thinking Skills Development", in: International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11:18, pp. 11585–11592. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1121248.pdf.

LEVANT, Y., COULMONT, M., SANDU, R. 2016. “Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills”, in: Accounting Education, 25:4, pp. 368–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1191272.

MILES, M. B., HUBERMAN, M. A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

MONEY, J., NIXON, S., GRAHAM, L. 2019. “Do educational experiences in school prepare students for university? A teachers’ perspective”, in: Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44:4, pp. 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2019.1595547.

MORGAN, D. L. 1996. Focus groups as qualitative research. Vol. 16. Sage publications.

NOVANTRI, W., MAISON, M., MUSLIM, M., AFTRIYATI, L. W. 2020. “Are Discovery Learning and Independent Learning Effective in Improving Students’ Cognitive Skills?”, in: Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3:2, pp. 144–152. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6615.

OSMANI, M., WEERAKKODY, V., HINDI, N., AL-ESMAIL, R., ELDABI, T., KAPOOR, K., IRANI. Z. 2015. “Identifying the trends and impact of graduate attributes on employability: a literature review”, in: Tertiary Education and Management, 21, pp. 367–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2015.1114139.

O’NEILL, G., MCMAHON, T. 2005. “Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers.” In: Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching I. Dublin: AISHE, pp. 27–36.

PECH, M., REHOR, P., SLABOVÁ, M. 2021. “Students Preferences in Teaching Methods of Entrepreneurship Education”, in: Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 14:2, pp. 66–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2021.140201.

PLUMMER-D'AMATO, P. 2008. “Focus group methodology Part 1: Considerations for design”, in: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 15:2, pp. 69–73.

STAVROULIA, K. E., CONSTANTINOU, M., SAMANTZIS, C., CHRYSANTHOU, Y., ZACHARATOS, H. 2015. “Fostering entrepreneurial mindset and skills through experiential learning: The Base project.” Proceeding of IAC-MEM, 13-14 November, Vienna.

THOMPSON, M., PAWSON, C., EVANS, B. 2015. “Navigating entry into higher education: the transition to independent learning and living”, in: Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45:10, pp. 1398–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2021.1933400.

TRELEAVEN, L., VOOLA, R. 2008. “Integrating the development of graduate attributes through constructive alignment”, in: Journal of marketing education, 30:2, pp. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308319352.

WILLIAMS, A., KATZ, L. 2001. “The use of focus group methodology in education: Some theoretical and practical consideration”, in: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 5:3. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/view/496.

WILLIAMSON, M. F., WATSON, R. L. 2007. “Learning styles research: Understanding how teaching should be impacted by the way learners learn part III: Understanding how learners’ personality styles impact learning”, in: Christian Education Journal, 4:1, pp. 62–77.

Veröffentlicht
2023-12-20
Sprache
Englisch
Forschungsansatz, -methode oder -verfahren
text
Schlagworte
Studierendenzentrierung, Lehr-Lernansatz, Lernumfeld, Erwartungen