Klassische Musterlösungs-Tutorien neu denken
Lehren am Übungsblatt in engen zeitlichen und fachlichen Rahmenbedingungen
Identifiers (Article)
Abstract
Tutorials accompanied by exercise sheets are classic teaching-learning activitites in under-graduate chemistry courses. Such sheets are also used in physics, mathematics, and other science-oriented subjects. In this paper, an exercise sheet-guided tutorial in chemistry was redesigned through implementation of innovative teaching concepts such as thinking classroom, sandwich structure, and theme-centered interaction (TCI). Both student ac-ceptance and learning success are evaluated and the question of whether the chosen meth-ods were a suitable choice for the development of problem-solving strategies by the stu-dents is discussed. Due to curricular circumstances, two groups of students learning un-der different conditions are compared and the impact of parallel courses offered at the same time as well as student attendance and absence in the tutorial are investigated. Unfor-tunately, a comprehensive activation of the students was not achieved through the selected methods and the high absence of students in the tutorial was identified as a further prob-lem.
Statistics

References
BERGER, L., SPANNAGEL, C., GRZEGA, J. 2015. Lernen durch Lehren im Fokus: Berichte von LdL-Einsteigern und LdL-Experten. 1 ed. Berlin: epubli.
BIGGS, J., TANG, C. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 3 ed. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
BISHOP, J., VERLEGER, M. A. 2013. „The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research.“ 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
DECI, E. L., RYAN, R. M. 1993. „Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik.“ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 39 (2), S. 223–238.
DESLARUIERS, L., MCCARTY, L. S., MILLER, K., CALLAGHAN, K., KESTIN, G. 2019. „Measuring Actual Learning Versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.“ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (39), S. 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.
GUPTA, A., ELBY, A. 2011. „Beyond Epistemological Deficits: Dynamic Explanations of Engineering Students’ Difficulties with Mathematical Sense-making.“ International Journal of Science Education 33 (18), S. 2463–2488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551551.
HANDKE, J., SPERL, A.. 2012. Das Inverted Classroom Model. Berlin, Boston: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
LANGMAACK, B. 2011. Einführung in die Themenzentrierte Interaktion (TZI) : Das Leiten von Lern- und Arbeitsgruppen erklärt und praktisch angewandt. 5., vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim; Basel: Beltz.
LILJEDAHL, P. 2016. „Building Thinking Classrooms: Conditions for Problem-Solving.“ In: FELMER, P., PEHKONEN, E., KILPATRICK, J. (Hg.) Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems: Advances and New Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing, S. 361–386.
MARTIN, J. P. 1996. „Das Projekt ‚Lernen durch Lehren‘ – Eine vorläufige Bilanz.“ Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen 25, S. 70–86.
NUNOKAWA, K. 2001. „Possible Activities Facilitating Solving Processes: A Lesson from a Stuck State.“ International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 32 (2), S. 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010010872.
ORLIN, B. 2017. „The State of Being Stuck.“ Math with Bad Drawings (blog). https://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2017/09/20/the-state-of-being-stuck/ (aufgerufen am 14.08.2024).
PRENZEL, M. 1993. „Autonomie und Motivation im Lernen Erwachsener“ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 39 (2), S. 239–253.
ROTH, G. 2004. „Warum sind Lehren und Lernen so schwierig?“ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 50 (4), S. 496–506.
SCHNEIDER-LANDOLF, M., SPIELMANN, J., ZITTERBARTH, W. (Hg.) 2017. Handbook of Theme-Centered Interaction (TCI). Göttingen; Bristol, CT, U.S.A.: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
SCHNEIDER, M., PRECKEL, F. 2017. „Variables Associated with Achievement in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Meta-analyses.“ Psychological Bulletin 143 (6), S. 565–600.
UNIVERSITÄT PADERBORN. 2011. https://www.uni-paderborn.de/lehre/lehrinnovationen/lehrprojekte/pingo
(aufgerufen am 12.11.2024)
WAHL, D., WÖLFING, W., RAPP, G., HEGER, D. 1995. Erwachsenenbildung konkret: Mehrphasiges Dozententraining; eine neue Form der erwachsenendidaktischen Ausbildung von Referenten und Dozenten. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien-Verlag.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
