Implementierung und Evaluation eines volldigitalen Workflows zur Herstellung von festsitzendem Zahnersatz in der vorklinischen Lehre

Moritz  Waldecker; Thomas  Stober; Lydia Eberhard; Wolfgang Bömicke

doi:10.11588/hint.2021.1.84507

Implementierung und Evaluation eines volldigitalen Workflows zur Herstellung von festsitzendem Zahnersatz in der vorklinischen Lehre

Moritz Waldecker (Author)
Thomas Stober (Author)
Lydia Eberhard (Author)
Wolfgang Bömicke (Author)

PDF (Deutsch)

Identifiers (Article)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11588/hint.2021.1.84507

Abstract

The increasing digitalization of dental medicine is changing everyday life in dentistry. Theoretical and practical knowledge of computer-based planning and manufacturing processes should therefore be taught at an early stage of dental studies. To implement a fully digital workflow in preclinical prosthetic teaching, a three-day block course was designed during which students of the second preclinical course were to learn how to restore patients with single-tooth crowns in a fully digital workflow. The success of the course was objectively assessed by means of quality control for each of the work steps. The subjective learning success and the satisfaction of the students with their participation in the course were determined by means of questionnaires. All students were able to produce perfectly fitting crowns. Their subjective learning success and their satisfaction with the course were given maximum scores by the students. Thus, a fully digital workflow was successfully implemented in preclinical teaching and the course enabled the students to provide future patients with fully digital care.

Statistics

References

HODGES, Brian, REGEHR, Glenn, MARTIN, Dawn. 2001. „Knowing What We Know – Difficulties in Recognising One’s Own Incompetence: Novice Physicians Who Are Unskilled and Unaware of It”, in: Academic Medicine, 76, S. 87–89.

JODA, Tim, LENHERR, Patrik, DEDEM, Philipp, KOVALTSCHUK, Irina, BRAGGER, Urs, ZITZMANN, Nicola U. 2016. „Time Efficiency, Difficulty, and Operator's Preference Comparing Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: A Randomized Controlled Trial”, in: Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28:10, S. 1318–1323.

KRUGER, Justin, DUNNING, David. 1999. „Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments”, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77:6, S. 1121–1134.

LEE, Sang J., MACARTHUR, Robert X., GALLUCCI, German O. 2013. „An Evaluation of Student and Clinician Perception of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions”, in: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 110:5, S. 420–423.

MANGANO, Francesco, GANDOLFI, Andrea, LUONGO, Giuseppe, LOGOZZO, Silvia. 2017. „Intraoral Scanners in Dentistry: A Review of the Current Literature”, in: BMC Oral Health 17(1): 149.

RAUPACH, T. & SCHIEKIRKA, S. 2015. “Handreichung zur Lernerfolgsevaluation”, Electric Paper Evaluationssysteme GmbH.

RINDERMANN, Heiner. 2001. Lehrevaluation. Einführung und Überblick zu Forschung und Praxis der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an Hochschulen mit einem Beitrag zur Evaluation computerbasierten Unterrichts. 2. erweiterte Auflage, Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.

SCHWINDLING, Franz Sebastian, DEISENHOFER, Ulrich Karl, PORSCHE, Monika, RAMMELSBERG, Peter, KAPPEL, Stefanie, STOBER, Thomas. 2015. „Establishing CAD/CAM in Preclinical Dental Education: Evaluation of a Hands-on Module”, in: Journal of Dental Education 79:10, S. 1215–1221.

ZITZMANN, Nicola U., KOVALTSCHUK, Irina, LENHERR, Patrik, DEDEM, Philipp, JODA, Tim. 2017. „Dental Students’ Perceptions of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial”, in: Journal of Dental Education, 81:10, S. 1227–1232.