Gutes Lernen braucht Struktur
Eine Reflexion zum Unterrichten von Erstsemester-Studierenden der Politikwissenschaft in der Onlinelehre
Identifiers (Article)
Abstract
Online teaching brings with it various challenges for instructors and students. It can be additionally challenging when teaching first-year students. This paper therefore summarizes a reflection on the implementation of an online-only seminar for first-year students of political science. In addition to a detailed description of the seminar structure, the results of a multi-part survey of the students accompanying the seminar are presented. Three aspects are given special attention regarding their role in the students' learning success: learning groups, evaluations of each seminar session, and the conceptualization of the seminar content towards the examination. Overall, the results show that a clear and communicated seminar structure, which is also adapted during the semester in a constant exchange with the students, contributes to the learning success of the students.
Statistics
References
BAIN, K. 2004. What best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
BIGGS, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2. Auflage, Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
BIGGS, J., TANG, C. 2011. Quality Learning at University. Berkshire: Open University Press.
BROCKBAND, A., MCGILL, J. 2007. Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. 2nd edition, Maidenhead and New York: SRHE & Open University Press, Mc Graw Hill.
CENDON, E. 2014. „Ermöglichen, unterstützen, reflektieren?! Aufgaben von Lehrenden in der
Hochschulweiterbildung“, in: Hochschule und Weiterbildung, 2, S. 29–33.
FLEISCHMANN, A. 2020. „Der Ursprung von Constructive Alignment. John Biggs‘ und Catherine Tangs Teaching for Quality Learning at University und seine Wirkung“, in: TREMP. P.,
EUGSTER, B. (Hg.) Klassiker der Hochschuldidaktik? Kartografie einer Landschaft.
Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 245–254.
HUBER, L., PILNIOK, A., SETHE, R., SZCZYRBA, B., VOGEL. M. 2018. Forschendes Lehren im eigenen Fach. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Beispielen. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
KAUFMANN, D., EGGENSPERGER, P. 2017. Gute Lehre in den Naturwissenschaften. Der Werkzeugkas-ten: Einfach. Schnell. Erfolgreich. Berlin: Springer.
KLÖBER, R. 2020. „Charakteristika und Möglichkeiten forschenden Lehrens. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning an der Universität Heidelberg“, in: Heidelberg Inspirations for Innovative Teaching, 1:1, S. 11–26.
NEUMANN, B., EGGENSPERGER, P., SANDMEIER, A. 2019. Soziale Kompetenzen (3). Grundlagen guter Lerngruppen. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00026089.
PFÄFFLI, B. K. 2015. Lehren an Hochschulen. Eine Hochschuldidaktik für den Aufbau von Wissen und Kompetenzen. Bern: Haupt Verlag.
ROGERS, C. R. 1967. “The Interpersonal Relationship in the Facilitating of Learning”, in: LEEPER, Robert R. (Hg.) Humanizing Education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, S. 1–18.
ROXÅ, T., OLSSON, T., MÅRTENSSON, K. 2008. “Appropriate Use of Theory in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as a Strategy for Institutional Development”, in: Arts’ and Humani-ties in Higher Education, 7:3, S. 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022208094412.
