Collaborative Mapping in the Age of Ubiquitous Internet: An Archaeological Perspective
Identifier (Artikel)
Identifier (Dateien)
Abstract
Over the past decade, collaborative mapping projects have become widespread, allowing for and promoting voluntary participation in cartographic processes. A major factor in the increasing popularity of collaborative mapping in recent years has been the developments in digital cartographic media in general and internet mapping in particular. In this paper the aim is to discuss the possibilities of online collaborative mapping in archaeology. Following an overview of collaborative mapping and its current state in today‘s increasingly online and digital world, four potential modes are introduced through which collaborative mapping in archaeology can be carried out: psychogeography, local community involvement, an online archaeology map system and spatial narratives.
Statistiken
Literaturhinweise
Aberley (1993): D. Aberley, Boundaries of home: mapping for local empowerment, Gabriola Island and Philadelphia.
Atalay (2008): S. Atalay, „Multivocality and indigenous archaeologies“, in: Junko Habu, Clare Fawcett, and John M. Matsunaga (eds.), Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies, New York, 29–44.
Caquard (2011): S. Caquard, „Cartography I: Mapping Narrative Cartography“, Progress in Human Geography 37 (1), 135–144.
Chambers (2006): R. Chambers, „Participatory Mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose Map? Who is Empowered and Who Disempowered? Who Gains and Who Loses?“, Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 25 (2), 1–11.
Chapin et al. (2005): M. Chapin/ Z. Lamb / B. Threlkeld, „Mapping Indigenous Lands“, Annual Review of Anthropology 34, 619–638.
Clifford (1996): S. Clifford, „Places, people, and parish maps“, in: Sue Clifford and Angela King (eds.), From Place to PLACE: Maps and Parish Maps, London, 3–7.
Conkey / Gero (1997): W. Conkey / M. Gero, „Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology“, Annual Review of Anthropology 26, 411–437.
Crampton (2009): J.W. Crampton, „Cartography: Maps 2.0“, Progress in Human Geography 33 (1), p. 91–100.
Crampton (2010): J. W. Crampton, Mapping: a critical introduction to cartography and GIS, West Sussex.
Debord (1955): G. Debord, „Introduction à une Critique de la Géographie Urbaine“, Les Lèvres Nues 6, 11–15.
Dodge et al. (2011): M. Dodge / R. Kitchin / C. Perkins, „Introductory essay: technologies of mapping“, in: Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, and Chris Perkins (eds.), The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, West Sussex, 116–121.
Dreessen et al. (2012): K. Dreessen / L. Huybrechts / T. Laureyssens / S. Schepers / S. Baciu, MAP-it: a participatory mapping toolkit, Leuven.
Duke / Saitta (1998): P. Duke / D. Saitta, „An Emancipatory Archaeology for the Working Class“, Assemblage 4, 1–7.
Dunn (2007): C.E. Dunn, „Participatory GIS – a People’s GIS?“, Progress in Human Geography 31(5), 616–637.
Elwood (2002): S. Elwood, „GIS and Collaborative Urban Governance: Understanding Their Implications for Community Action and Power“, Urban Geography 22, 737–759.
Elwood (2006): S. Elwood, „Critical Issues in Participatory GIS: Deconstructions, Reconstructions, and New Research Directions“, Transactions in GIS 10 (5), 693–708.
Gartner (2009): G. Gartner, „Web mapping 2.0“, in: Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, and Chris Perkins (eds.), Rethinking Maps, London and New York, 68–82.
Grasseni (2004): C. Grasseni, „Skilled Landscapes: Mapping Practices of Locality“, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22, 699–717.
Harley (1988): J.B. Harley, „Maps, knowledge and power“, in: Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels (eds.), The Iconography of Landscape, Cambridge, 277–312.
Harmon (2004): K. Harmon, You are here: personal geographies and other maps of the imagination, New York.
Harmon (2009): K. Harmon, The map as art: contemporary artists explore cartography, New York.
Harris (2015): T.M. Harris, „Deep geography - deep mapping: spatial storytelling and a sense of place“, in: David J. Bodenhamer, John Corrigan, and Trevor M. Harris (eds.), Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives, Bloomington, 28–53.
Jacob (2006): C. Jacob, The sovereign map: theoretical approaches in cartography throughout history, T. Conley (trans.), E.H. Dahl (ed.), Chicago and London.
Joyce / Tringham (2007): R.A. Joyce / R.E. Tringham, „Feminist Adventures in Hypertext“, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14 (3), 328–358.
King / Clifford (1985): A. King / S. Clifford, Holding your ground: an action guide to local conservation, London.
Kitchin / Dodge (2007): R. Kitchin / M. Dodge, „Rethinking Maps“, Progress in Human Geography 31 (3), 331–344.
Kitchin et al. (2011): R. Kitchin / M. Dodge / C. Perkins, „Introductory essay: power and politics of mapping“, in: Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, and Chris Perkins (eds.), The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, West Sussex, 388–394.
Kyem (2004): P.A.K. Kyem, „Of Intractable Conflicts and Participatory GIS Applications: the Search for Consensus Amidst Competing Claims and Institutional Demands“, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1), 37–57.
Lee (2016): D. Lee, „Map Orkney Month: Imagining Archaeological Mappings“, Livingmaps Review 1 (1), 1–25.
Nold (2009): C. Nold, „Introduction: emotional cartography - technologies of the self“, in: Christian Nold (ed.), Emotional Cartography: Technologies of the Self, emotionalcartography.net/EmotionalCartography.pdf (26.02.2017), 3–14.
Obrist (2014): H.U. Obrist, Mapping it out: an alternative atlas of contemporary cartographies, London.
O’Rourke (2013): K. O’Rourke, Walking and mapping: artists as cartographers, Cambridge (MA) and London.
Parker (2006): B. Parker, „Constructing Community Through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping“, The Professional Geographer 58 (4), 470–484.
Perkins (2007): C. Perkins, „Community Mapping“, The Cartographic Journal: The World of Mapping 44(2), 127–137.
Perkins (2014): C. Perkins, „Plotting Practices and Politics: (Im)mutable Narratives in OpenStreetMap“, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39, 304–317.
Perry / Beale (2015): S. Perry / N. Beale, “The Social Web and Archaeology’s Restructuring: Impact, Exploitation, Disciplinary Change”, Open Archaeology 1, 153–165.
Pinder (1996): D. Pinder, „Subverting Cartography: the Situationists and Maps of the City“, Environment and Planning A 28(3), 405–427.
Pinder (2005): D. Pinder, „Arts of Urban Exploration“, Cultural Geographies 12, 383–411.
Ratliff (2007): E. Ratliff, „The Whole Earth, Catalogued. How Google Maps is Changing the Way We See the World“, Wired 15 (7), 154–159.
Rød et al. (2001): J.K. Rød / F. Ormeling / C. Van Elzakker, „An agenda for democratising cartographic visualisation“, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift (Norwegian Journal of Geography) 55 (1), 38–41.
Sletto (2009): B.I. Sletto, “’We Drew What We Imagined’: Participatory Mapping, Performance, and the Arts of Landscape Making“, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 50 (4), 443–476.
Wainwright / Bryan (2009): J. Wainwright / J. Bryan, „Cartography, Territory, Property: Postcolonial Reflections on Indigenous Counter-Mapping in Nicaragua and Belize“, Cultural Geographies 16, 153–178.
Walker et al. (2002): D.H. Walker / A.M. Leitch / R. de Lai / A. Cottrell / D. Pullar, „A community-based and collaborative GIS joint venture in rural Australia“, in: William J. Craig, Trevor M. Harris, and Daniel Weiner (eds.), Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, London and New York, 137–152.
Williamson / Connolly (2009): D. Williamson / E. Connolly, „theirwork: the development of sustainable mapping“, in: Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, and Chris Perkins (eds.), Rethinking Maps, London and New York, 97–112.
Wood (2010a): D. Wood, „Lynch Debord: About Two Psychogeographies“, Cartographica 45(3), 185–200.
Wood (2010b): D. Wood with J. Fels / J. Krygier, Rethinking the power of maps, New York and London.
Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
